lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1AC5DB12-0E72-4AB6-B3B5-F1C40EC36F26@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 15:27:06 -0400
From:   Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:     Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...il.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs-anna tree


> On May 28, 2020, at 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>  include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>  2baebf955125 ("SUNRPC: Split the xdr_buf event class")
> 
> from the nfs-anna tree and commit:
> 
>  998024dee197 ("SUNRPC: Add more svcsock tracepoints")
> 
> from the nfsd tree.

Alternately, I can provide a v4 nfsd-5.8 series for Bruce that
includes 2baebf955125 ("SUNRPC: Split the xdr_buf event class")
so that these merge conflicts are avoided.


> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> index 73193c79fcaa,852413cbb7d9..000000000000
> --- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> @@@ -14,9 -14,41 +14,42 @@@
>  #include <linux/net.h>
>  #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> 
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_STREAM);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_DGRAM);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_RAW);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_RDM);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_SEQPACKET);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_DCCP);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SOCK_PACKET);
> + 
> + #define show_socket_type(type)					\
> + 	__print_symbolic(type,					\
> + 		{ SOCK_STREAM,		"STREAM" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_DGRAM,		"DGRAM" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_RAW,		"RAW" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_RDM,		"RDM" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_SEQPACKET,	"SEQPACKET" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_DCCP,		"DCCP" },		\
> + 		{ SOCK_PACKET,		"PACKET" })
> + 
> + /* This list is known to be incomplete, add new enums as needed. */
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(AF_UNSPEC);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(AF_UNIX);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(AF_LOCAL);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(AF_INET);
> + TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(AF_INET6);
> + 
> + #define rpc_show_address_family(family)				\
> + 	__print_symbolic(family,				\
> + 		{ AF_UNSPEC,		"AF_UNSPEC" },		\
> + 		{ AF_UNIX,		"AF_UNIX" },		\
> + 		{ AF_LOCAL,		"AF_LOCAL" },		\
> + 		{ AF_INET,		"AF_INET" },		\
> + 		{ AF_INET6,		"AF_INET6" })
> + 
> -DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xdr_buf_class,
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(rpc_xdr_buf_class,
>  	TP_PROTO(
> +		const struct rpc_task *task,
>  		const struct xdr_buf *xdr
>  	),
> 

--
Chuck Lever



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ