[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <824d63d8-668c-22c8-a303-b44e30e805e1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 00:26:17 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lost PCIe PME after a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't select
CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default")
On 29.05.2020 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:21:35PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that makes sense. I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty
>> sure there's a reason why we ask for the whole set of things. Seems
>> like it solved some problem. I think Matthew Garrett might have been
>> involved in that.
>
> This was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638912 - some
> firmware misbehaves unless you pass the same set of supported
> functionality as Windows does.
>
Current situation means that PME is unusable on all systems where
pcie_aspm_support_enabled() returns false, what is basically every
system except EXPERT mode is enabled and CONFIG_PCIEASPM is set.
So we definitely need to do something.
One question is whether the system from the 10yr old bug report
actually depends on OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL control, or whether
some other change in recent years fixed the issue.
Not sure whether the system is still available for re-testing.
If worst case we have 10yr old systems breaking with a new kernel
then we still would have the workaround to enable CONFIG_PCIEASPM
on that system.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists