[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200529232723.44942-6-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 00:27:21 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] TEST_ACCESS_OK _never_ had been checked anywhere
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Once upon a time the predecessor of that thing (TEST_VERIFY_AREA)
used to be. However, that had been gone for years now (and
the patch that introduced TEST_ACCESS_OK has not touched any
ifdefs - they got gradually removed later). Just bury it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h
index 0dca7f7aeff2..fb10f2f8f4f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h
@@ -32,13 +32,6 @@ extern pmd_t initial_pg_pmd[];
void paging_init(void);
void sync_initial_page_table(void);
-/*
- * Define this if things work differently on an i386 and an i486:
- * it will (on an i486) warn about kernel memory accesses that are
- * done without a 'access_ok( ..)'
- */
-#undef TEST_ACCESS_OK
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
# include <asm/pgtable-3level.h>
#else
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists