linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 09:38:11 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

Hi Paul,

On Fri, 29 May 2020 07:15:01 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Given that the merge window might be opening in a couple days, my thought
> is to defer these -rcu commits to my v5.9 pile, and then I resolve this
> conflict in the -rcu tree when v5.8-rc1 comes out.  I just now adjusted
> the -rcu tree's rcu/next branch accordingly.
> 
> Seem reasonable?

Sure, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped