[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200530093811.58b1efe2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 09:38:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 29 May 2020 07:15:01 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Given that the merge window might be opening in a couple days, my thought
> is to defer these -rcu commits to my v5.9 pile, and then I resolve this
> conflict in the -rcu tree when v5.8-rc1 comes out. I just now adjusted
> the -rcu tree's rcu/next branch accordingly.
>
> Seem reasonable?
Sure, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists