[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d8b13db-9d77-416d-e283-9ea509ce43d1@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 21:48:18 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next-20200528 - build error in kernel/rcu/refperf.c
On 5/28/20 9:16 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> commit 9088b449814f788d24f35a5840b6b2c2a23cd32a
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon May 25 17:22:24 2020 -0700
>
> refperf: Provide module parameter to specify number of experiments
>
> changes this line of code (line 389)
>
> - reader_tasks[exp].result_avg = 1000 * process_durations(exp) / ((exp + 1) * loops);
> + result_avg[exp] = 1000 * process_durations(nreaders) / (nreaders * loops);
>
> On a 32-bit ARM make allmodconfig with gcc 8.3, this results in:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [kernel/rcu/refperf.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:103: __modpost] Error 1
>
> I admit not understanding why the original line of code worked and the new one doesn't.
> Maybe gcc is smarter/dumber about the ranges of 'exp' and 'nreaders' than we thought?
>
Paul has already responded: (unfortunately)
"So I am restricting to 64BIT for the time being. Yeah, I know, lazy of
me. ;-)"
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200528180855.GP2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72/
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists