[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529164613.526f5865@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 16:46:13 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
between commit:
0b0ed657fe00 ("s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S")
from the s390 tree and commit:
d075fc3154be ("KVM: s390: vsie: Move conditional reschedule")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 4fde24a1856e,ef05b4e167fb..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@@ -1000,9 -1000,9 +1000,6 @@@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu
handle_last_fault(vcpu, vsie_page);
- if (need_resched())
- schedule();
- if (test_cpu_flag(CIF_MCCK_PENDING))
- s390_handle_mcck();
--
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
/* save current guest state of bp isolation override */
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists