[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202005290036.3FEFFDA@keescook>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 00:41:51 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc: christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cyphar@...har.com,
jannh@...gle.com, jeffv@...gle.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, palmer@...gle.com, rsesek@...gle.com,
tycho@...ho.ws, Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/seccomp: Test SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:08:58AM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> + EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND, &resp), 0);
> +
> + nextid = req.id + 1;
> +
> + /* Wait for getppid to be called for the second time */
> + sleep(1);
I always rebel at finding "sleep" in tests. ;) Is this needed? IIUC,
userspace will immediately see EINPROGRESS after the NOTIF_SEND
finishes, yes?
Otherwise, yes, this looks good.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists