[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529090824.GB9011@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:08:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: Fix reference count leak in
edac_device_register_sysfs_main_kobj()
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:45:08AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Would you like to indicate with such information (according to
> the topic “net-sysfs: Fix reference count leak in rx|netdev_queue_add_kobject”)
> that your issue was detected also with the help of the kernel fuzzing
> tool “syzkaller”?
There's no need for any commt reference - there's text over
kobject_init_and_add() explaining what you need to do when that function
fails.
> How do you think about to add an imperative wording to the change description?
His commit message is fine.
> Will it be helpful to combine this update step together with
> “edac: Fix reference count leak in edac_pci_main_kobj_setup”
> into a small patch series?
Just combine them into one patch.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists