| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:28 +0100
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@...ts.01.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus, Torvalds," <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
philip.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: 28307d938f ("percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp .."):
BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in boot stage
On 29/05/20 08:16, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> commit 28307d938fb2e4056ed4c982c06d1503d7719813
> Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu May 7 18:36:10 2020 -0700
> Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> CommitDate: Thu May 7 19:27:21 2020 -0700
>
> percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context
>
> Since 5.7-rc1, on btrfs we have a percpu counter initialization for
> which we always pass a GFP_KERNEL gfp_t argument (this happens since
> commit 2992df73268f78 ("btrfs: Implement DREW lock")).
>
> That is safe in some contextes but not on others where allowing fs
> reclaim could lead to a deadlock because we are either holding some
> btrfs lock needed for a transaction commit or holding a btrfs
> transaction handle open. Because of that we surround the call to the
> function that initializes the percpu counter with a NOFS context using
> memalloc_nofs_save() (this is done at btrfs_init_fs_root()).
>
> However it turns out that this is not enough to prevent a possible
> deadlock because percpu_alloc() determines if it is in an atomic context
> by looking exclusively at the gfp flags passed to it (GFP_KERNEL in this
> case) and it is not aware that a NOFS context is set.
>
> Because percpu_alloc() thinks it is in a non atomic context it locks the
> pcpu_alloc_mutex. This can result in a btrfs deadlock when
> pcpu_balance_workfn() is running, has acquired that mutex and is waiting
> for reclaim, while the btrfs task that called percpu_counter_init() (and
> therefore percpu_alloc()) is holding either the btrfs commit_root
> semaphore or a transaction handle (done fs/btrfs/backref.c:
> iterate_extent_inodes()), which prevents reclaim from finishing as an
> attempt to commit the current btrfs transaction will deadlock.
>
> Lockdep reports this issue with the following trace:
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-77 #1 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kswapd0/91 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8938a3b3fdc8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffffb4f0dbc0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
> fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30
> __kmalloc+0x5f/0x3a0
> pcpu_create_chunk+0x19/0x230
> pcpu_balance_workfn+0x56a/0x680
> process_one_work+0x235/0x5f0
> worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
> kthread+0x120/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
>
> -> #3 (pcpu_alloc_mutex){+.+.}:
> __mutex_lock+0xa9/0xaf0
> pcpu_alloc+0x480/0x7c0
> __percpu_counter_init+0x50/0xd0
> btrfs_drew_lock_init+0x22/0x70 [btrfs]
> btrfs_get_fs_root+0x29c/0x5c0 [btrfs]
> resolve_indirect_refs+0x120/0xa30 [btrfs]
> find_parent_nodes+0x50b/0xf30 [btrfs]
> btrfs_find_all_leafs+0x60/0xb0 [btrfs]
> iterate_extent_inodes+0x139/0x2f0 [btrfs]
> iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xe0 [btrfs]
> btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0xb4/0x190 [btrfs]
> btrfs_ioctl+0x165a/0x3130 [btrfs]
> ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x260
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}:
> down_write+0x38/0x70
> btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2ec/0x500 [btrfs]
> find_free_extent+0xc6a/0x1600 [btrfs]
> btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
> btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs]
> alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs]
> __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x5a0 [btrfs]
> btrfs_cow_block+0x106/0x240 [btrfs]
> commit_cowonly_roots+0x55/0x310 [btrfs]
> btrfs_commit_transaction+0x509/0xb20 [btrfs]
> sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
> generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
> kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
> btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
> deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70
> cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160
> task_work_run+0x93/0xc0
> exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf9/0x100
> do_syscall_64+0x20d/0x260
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}:
> down_read+0x3c/0x140
> find_free_extent+0xef6/0x1600 [btrfs]
> btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
> btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs]
> alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs]
> __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x5a0 [btrfs]
> btrfs_cow_block+0x106/0x240 [btrfs]
> btrfs_search_slot+0x50c/0xd60 [btrfs]
> btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs]
> __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x90/0x280 [btrfs]
> __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x81f/0x870 [btrfs]
> __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x180 [btrfs]
> btrfs_commit_transaction+0x31b/0xb20 [btrfs]
> iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0
> ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0
> __ia32_sys_sync+0xa/0x10
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x260
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}:
> __lock_acquire+0xef0/0x1c80
> lock_acquire+0xa2/0x1d0
> __mutex_lock+0xa9/0xaf0
> __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
> btrfs_evict_inode+0x40d/0x560 [btrfs]
> evict+0xd9/0x1c0
> dispose_list+0x48/0x70
> prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
> super_cache_scan+0x124/0x1a0
> do_shrink_slab+0x176/0x440
> shrink_slab+0x23a/0x2c0
> shrink_node+0x188/0x6e0
> balance_pgdat+0x31d/0x7f0
> kswapd+0x238/0x550
> kthread+0x120/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> &delayed_node->mutex --> pcpu_alloc_mutex --> fs_reclaim
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(fs_reclaim);
> lock(pcpu_alloc_mutex);
> lock(fs_reclaim);
> lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 3 locks held by kswapd0/91:
> #0: (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
> #1: (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x12f/0x2c0
> #2: (&type->s_umount_key#43){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 91 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-77 #1
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0
> check_noncircular+0x170/0x190
> __lock_acquire+0xef0/0x1c80
> lock_acquire+0xa2/0x1d0
> __mutex_lock+0xa9/0xaf0
> __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
> btrfs_evict_inode+0x40d/0x560 [btrfs]
> evict+0xd9/0x1c0
> dispose_list+0x48/0x70
> prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
> super_cache_scan+0x124/0x1a0
> do_shrink_slab+0x176/0x440
> shrink_slab+0x23a/0x2c0
> shrink_node+0x188/0x6e0
> balance_pgdat+0x31d/0x7f0
> kswapd+0x238/0x550
> kthread+0x120/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
>
> This could be fixed by making btrfs pass GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL
> to percpu_counter_init() in contextes where it is not reclaim safe,
> however that type of approach is discouraged since
> memalloc_[nofs|noio]_save() were introduced. Therefore this change
> makes pcpu_alloc() look up into an existing nofs/noio context before
> deciding whether it is in an atomic context or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200430164356.15543-1-fdmanana@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> cbfc35a486 mm/slub: fix incorrect interpretation of s->offset
> 28307d938f percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context
> +----------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | | cbfc35a486 | 28307d938f |
> +----------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | boot_successes | 37 | 0 |
> | boot_failures | 8 | 17 |
> | WARNING:at_kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c:#rcu_torture_fwd_prog | 2 | |
> | RIP:rcu_torture_fwd_prog | 2 | |
> | BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_test_stage | 3 | |
> | BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage | 1 | |
> | BUG:kernel_hang_in_test_stage | 2 | |
> | BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_boot_stage | 0 | 17 |
> +----------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> [ 0.144174] RAMDISK: [mem 0x7fa2e000-0x7fffffff]
> [ 0.144559] ACPI: Early table checksum verification disabled
> [ 0.144985] ACPI: RSDP 0x00000000000F5850 000014 (v00 BOCHS )
> [ 0.145424] ACPI: RSDT 0x00000000BFFE15C9 000030 (v01 BOCHS BXPCRSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
> [ 0.146051] ACPI: FACP 0x00000000BFFE149D 000074 (v01 BOCHS BXPCFACP 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
> BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in boot stage
>
>
> # HH:MM RESULT GOOD BAD GOOD_BUT_DIRTY DIRTY_NOT_BAD
> git bisect start cef077e6aa4c7dbe2f23e1201cf705f9540ec467 v5.6 --
> git bisect good d32cedbec0a64e24548986a0159ab86cfe6a4097 # 08:34 G 10 0 0 6 staging: wfx: drop struct wfx_queue_stats
> git bisect good 2760220700ac830837742bad575630cd9bac8eba # 08:34 G 10 0 0 6 staging: wfx: show counters of all interfaces
> git bisect bad 832cc98141b4b93acbb9231ca9e36f7fbe347f47 # 08:35 B 0 17 33 0 staging: wfx: fix double free
> git bisect good faeea64fb9748002ed2aecff6e5caa01cc829735 # 08:39 G 10 0 0 9 staging: qlge: Remove goto statements from ql_get_mac_addr_reg
> git bisect good 986da7debb04225221d8876b405c4088614ae5f4 # 08:39 G 11 0 0 4 staging: vt6656: Return on isr0 when zero.
> git bisect good 3be1acffe684b11b9447cc7140ea0e59efa19a20 # 08:39 G 18 0 0 8 staging: vt6655: remove else after return and invert condition
> git bisect good 0729bb9b2a97a279c4b7c7be8565d494aab3d6e9 # 08:39 G 11 0 0 0 staging: vt6655: fix LONG_LINE warning
> git bisect bad ae73e7784871ebe2c43da619b4a1e2c9ff81508d # 08:39 B 0 23 39 0 Merge 5.7-rc5 into staging-next
> git bisect good 2e11cc1ab790ccbc7c7f6ed74c0f40b85c561dc7 # 08:39 G 11 0 0 4 staging: vt6656: Use const for read only data
> git bisect good b9388959ba507c7a48ac18e4aa3b63b8a910ed99 # 08:39 G 10 0 0 2 Merge tag 'tag-chrome-platform-fixes-for-v5.7-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chrome-platform/linux
> git bisect good 9ecc4d775f61fb3fd26a1b8cc70a56a98b3b40d3 # 08:39 G 11 0 0 4 Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-5.7-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> git bisect bad c61529f6f59c9e136432cde96f9a053a51ad2a1e # 08:39 B 0 21 37 0 Merge tag 'driver-core-5.7-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core
> git bisect bad af38553c661207f96464e15f3506bf788daee474 # 08:39 B 0 11 27 0 Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
> git bisect bad 8d58f222e85f01da0c0e1fc1e77986c86de889e2 # 10:31 B 0 11 37 10 ubsan: disable UBSAN_ALIGNMENT under COMPILE_TEST
> git bisect good 0c54a6a44bf3d41e76ce3f583a6ece267618df2e # 12:35 G 11 0 1 1 eventpoll: fix missing wakeup for ovflist in ep_poll_callback
> git bisect bad 28307d938fb2e4056ed4c982c06d1503d7719813 # 12:51 B 0 10 26 0 percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context
> git bisect good cbfc35a48609ceac978791e3ab9dde0c01f8cb20 # 13:58 G 10 0 2 2 mm/slub: fix incorrect interpretation of s->offset
> # first bad commit: [28307d938fb2e4056ed4c982c06d1503d7719813] percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context
> git bisect good cbfc35a48609ceac978791e3ab9dde0c01f8cb20 # 14:10 G 30 0 2 6 mm/slub: fix incorrect interpretation of s->offset
> # extra tests with debug options
> # extra tests on head commit of linus/master
> # 119: [75caf310d16cc5e2f851c048cd597f5437013368] Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
> # extra tests on revert first bad commit
> # 119: [9ae36539355c14fa1681e66744db5fc4e4066013] Revert "percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context"
> # extra tests on linus/master
> # duplicated: [75caf310d16cc5e2f851c048cd597f5437013368] Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
> # extra tests on linux-next/master
> # 119: [ff387fc20c697cdc887b2abf7ef494e853795a2f] Add linux-next specific files for 20200528
Weird, what you are getting is the following warning from lock torture:
[ 230.933509] rcu_torture_fwd_prog_nr: Duration 23169 cver 147 gps 517
[ 232.781662] wait for background processes: 2359 2446 2428 kmemleak
oom-killer meminfo
[ 232.781828]
[ 236.852893] /lkp/lkp/src/monitors/kmemleak: line 19:
/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: Permission denied
[ 236.853034]
[ 237.383893] cat: /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: No such file or directory
[ 237.384049]
[ 237.460489] /lkp/lkp/src/monitors/kmemleak: line 21:
/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: Permission denied
[ 237.460644]
[ 242.783491] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 242.784038] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 259 at kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c:1939
rcu_torture_fwd_prog+0xb8b/0xc90
[ 242.785139] Modules linked in: intel_rapl_common aesni_intel
input_leds qemu_fw_cfg ata_piix evbug libata scsi_mod ip_tables x_tables
[ 242.786347] CPU: 0 PID: 259 Comm: rcu_torture_fwd Not tainted
5.7.0-rc4-00167-gcbfc35a48609c #2
[ 242.787190] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 242.788001] RIP: 0010:rcu_torture_fwd_prog+0xb8b/0xc90
[ 242.788516] Code: ff 05 89 9c eb 03 e9 87 fe ff ff 48 ff 05 5d 9b eb
03 e9 37 f5 ff ff 48 ff 05 e9 9c eb 03 e9 8d f8 ff ff 48 ff 05 9d 9b eb
03 <0f> 0b 31 c9 31 d2 89 c6 48 c7 c7 e8 af f0 84 e8 61 62 13 00 48 c7
[ 242.790275] RSP: 0018:ffff8881a1ca7dd8 EFLAGS: 00010203
[ 242.790806] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 00000000ffffbe54 RCX:
ffffffff81390d54
[ 242.791503] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:
ffffffff84f0b038
[ 242.792197] RBP: ffff8881a1ca7f08 R08: ffffed103e99b901 R09:
ffffed103e99b901
[ 242.792887] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff8881f4cdc807 R12:
0000000000000021
[ 242.793622] R13: ffff8881a1c38000 R14: ffff8881f2eb2a60 R15:
000000000000039e
[ 242.794315] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f6e00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 242.795095] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 242.795672] CR2: 00007f7322dbdfd3 CR3: 00000001842ac000 CR4:
00000000000406f0
[ 242.796365] Call Trace:
[ 242.796685] ? lock_downgrade+0x3a0/0x3a0
[ 242.797253] ? rcu_torture_barrier_cbs+0x2c0/0x2c0
[ 242.797750] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1b5/0x290
[ 242.798225] ? ftrace_likely_update+0x40/0xb0
[ 242.798688] ? __kthread_parkme+0x197/0x1b0
[ 242.799163] ? rcu_torture_barrier_cbs+0x2c0/0x2c0
[ 242.799666] kthread+0x286/0x2a0
[ 242.800029] ? kzalloc+0x10/0x10
[ 242.800535] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[ 242.801100] irq event stamp: 5914
[ 242.801459] hardirqs last enabled at (5913): [<ffffffff829572cc>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x9c/0xa0
[ 242.802368] hardirqs last disabled at (5914): [<ffffffff8100552f>]
trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 242.803256] softirqs last enabled at (5346): [<ffffffff82c00745>]
__do_softirq+0x745/0x9a3
[ 242.804066] softirqs last disabled at (5339): [<ffffffff8114aab6>]
irq_exit+0x166/0x190
[ 242.804840] ---[ end trace 1b06f72ec0ecb2c1 ]---
[ 247.844430] /lkp/lkp/src/monitors/kmemleak: line 19:
/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: Permission denied
[ 247.844578]
[ 248.305602] cat: /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: No such file or directory
I just tried a 5.7-rc7 kernel with lock torture enabled as in your config:
CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST=m
CONFIG_TORTURE_TEST=y
CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=y
And I didn't get any warnings or problems, I was able to boot and use
the vm.
I'm not familiar with lock torture internals, and I can't see why it
failed for you.
Are you able to boot on a 5.7-rc7?
Thanks.
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists