| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:38:42 +0200
From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] drm/panfrost: move devfreq_init()/fini() in device
Hi Steven
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 15:22, Steven Price <steven.price@....com> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2020 17:55, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Later we will introduce devfreq probing regulator if they
> > are present. As regulator should be probe only one time we
> > need to get this logic in the device_init().
> >
> > panfrost_device is already taking care of devfreq_resume()
> > and devfreq_suspend(), so it's not totally illogic to move
> > the devfreq_init() and devfreq_fini() here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 37 ++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 15 ++-------
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> > index 8136babd3ba9..f480127205d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
> > @@ -212,59 +212,67 @@ int panfrost_device_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > + err = panfrost_devfreq_init(pfdev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(pfdev->dev, "devfreq init failed %d\n", err);
> > + goto err_out0;
> > + }
> > +
> > err = panfrost_regulator_init(pfdev);
> > if (err) {
> > dev_err(pfdev->dev, "regulator init failed %d\n", err);
> > - goto err_out0;
> > + goto err_out1;
>
> NIT: Rather than just renumbering these can we give them sensible names
> so we don't have this sort of refactoring in future?
Agree, I will change that in v2
>
> > }
> >
> > err = panfrost_reset_init(pfdev);
> > if (err) {
> > dev_err(pfdev->dev, "reset init failed %d\n", err);
> > - goto err_out1;
> > + goto err_out2;
> > }
> >
> > err = panfrost_pm_domain_init(pfdev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_out2;
> > + goto err_out3;
> >
> > res = platform_get_resource(pfdev->pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > pfdev->iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(pfdev->dev, res);
> > if (IS_ERR(pfdev->iomem)) {
> > dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to ioremap iomem\n");
> > err = PTR_ERR(pfdev->iomem);
> > - goto err_out3;
> > + goto err_out4;
> > }
> >
> > err = panfrost_gpu_init(pfdev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_out3;
> > + goto err_out4;
> >
> > err = panfrost_mmu_init(pfdev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_out4;
> > + goto err_out5;
> >
> > err = panfrost_job_init(pfdev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_out5;
> > + goto err_out6;
> >
> > err = panfrost_perfcnt_init(pfdev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_out6;
> > + goto err_out7;
> >
> > return 0;
> > -err_out6:
> > +err_out7:
> > panfrost_job_fini(pfdev);
> > -err_out5:
> > +err_out6:
> > panfrost_mmu_fini(pfdev);
> > -err_out4:
> > +err_out5:
> > panfrost_gpu_fini(pfdev);
> > -err_out3:
> > +err_out4:
> > panfrost_pm_domain_fini(pfdev);
> > -err_out2:
> > +err_out3:
> > panfrost_reset_fini(pfdev);
> > -err_out1:
> > +err_out2:
> > panfrost_regulator_fini(pfdev);
> > +err_out1:
> > + panfrost_devfreq_fini(pfdev);
> > err_out0:
> > panfrost_clk_fini(pfdev);
> > return err;
> > @@ -278,6 +286,7 @@ void panfrost_device_fini(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > panfrost_gpu_fini(pfdev);
> > panfrost_pm_domain_fini(pfdev);
> > panfrost_reset_fini(pfdev);
> > + panfrost_devfreq_fini(pfdev);
> > panfrost_regulator_fini(pfdev);
> > panfrost_clk_fini(pfdev);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > index 882fecc33fdb..4dda68689015 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
> > #include <drm/drm_utils.h>
> >
> > #include "panfrost_device.h"
> > -#include "panfrost_devfreq.h"
> > #include "panfrost_gem.h"
> > #include "panfrost_mmu.h"
> > #include "panfrost_job.h"
> > @@ -606,13 +605,6 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err_out0;
> > }
> >
> > - err = panfrost_devfreq_init(pfdev);
> > - if (err) {
> > - if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Fatal error during devfreq init\n");
>
> You seem to have lost the check for EPROBE_DEFER during the move.
Correct, sorry for that, I will fix it in v2.
Thanks for your review,
Clement
>
> > - goto err_out1;
> > - }
> > -
> > pm_runtime_set_active(pfdev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pfdev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_enable(pfdev->dev);
> > @@ -625,16 +617,14 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > */
> > err = drm_dev_register(ddev, 0);
> > if (err < 0)
> > - goto err_out2;
> > + goto err_out1;
> >
> > panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(ddev);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > -err_out2:
> > - pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
> > - panfrost_devfreq_fini(pfdev);
> > err_out1:
> > + pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
> > panfrost_device_fini(pfdev);
> > err_out0:
> > drm_dev_put(ddev);
> > @@ -650,7 +640,6 @@ static int panfrost_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > panfrost_gem_shrinker_cleanup(ddev);
> >
> > pm_runtime_get_sync(pfdev->dev);
> > - panfrost_devfreq_fini(pfdev);
> > panfrost_device_fini(pfdev);
> > pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pfdev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists