[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529130453.GB19915@lenoir>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:04:54 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
cai@....pw, mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] smp: Move irq_work_run() out of
flush_smp_call_function_queue()
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This ensures flush_smp_call_function_queue() is strictly about
> call_single_queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/smp.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ int smpcfd_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> * still pending.
> */
> flush_smp_call_function_queue(false);
> + irq_work_run();
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -191,6 +192,14 @@ static int generic_exec_single(int cpu,
> void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
> {
> flush_smp_call_function_queue(true);
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle irq works queued remotely by irq_work_queue_on().
> + * Smp functions above are typically synchronous so they
> + * better run first since some other CPUs may be busy waiting
> + * for them.
> + */
You may want to update that comment once you merge remote irq_work and csd.
Thanks.
> + irq_work_run();
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -267,14 +276,6 @@ static void flush_smp_call_function_queu
> csd_unlock(csd);
> func(info);
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * Handle irq works queued remotely by irq_work_queue_on().
> - * Smp functions above are typically synchronous so they
> - * better run first since some other CPUs may be busy waiting
> - * for them.
> - */
> - irq_work_run();
> }
>
> /*
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists