[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529140418.GA3530656@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 10:04:18 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] workqueue: Convert the pool::lock and
wq_mayday_lock to raw_spinlock_t
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:46:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The workqueue code has it's internal spinlocks (pool::lock), which
> are acquired on most workqueue operations. These spinlocks are
> converted to 'sleeping' spinlocks on a RT-kernel.
>
> Workqueue functions can be invoked from contexts which are truly atomic
> even on a PREEMPT_RT enabled kernel. Taking sleeping locks from such
> contexts is forbidden.
>
> The pool::lock hold times are bound and the code sections are
> relatively short, which allows to convert pool::lock and as a
> consequence wq_mayday_lock to raw spinlocks which are truly spinning
> locks even on a PREEMPT_RT kernel.
>
> With the previous conversion of the manager waitqueue to a simple
> waitqueue workqueues are now fully RT compliant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Applied 1-2 to wq/for-5.8.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists