[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9495ad7d-12be-edfb-8ac8-5f88a589b0e3@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 07:09:57 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
ming.lei@...hat.com, nstange@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, yukuai3@...wei.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
syzbot+603294af2d01acfdd6da@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free
On 2020-05-29 00:56, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:15:10PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> How about adding a lockdep_assert_held(&q->blk_trace_mutex) statement in
>> do_blk_trace_setup()?
>
> Sure, however that doesn't seem part of the fix. How about adding that
> as a separat patch?
That sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists