lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 10:26:00 -0400
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: remove useless unlock() and lock() in
 series

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:59:02AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> This is no point to unlock() and then lock() the same mutex
> back to back.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>

Applied to wq/for-5.8.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists