[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529152756.GA7452@invisiblethingslab.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:27:56 +0200
From: Wojtek Porczyk <woju@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Don Porter <porter@...unc.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:38:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> One useful test for the actual kernel patches would be to run your SGX
> workload on a loaded core. That is, do something like taskset -c
> 0 graphene_thing and, simultaneously, write a trivial infinite loop program
> and run that under taskset -c 0 as well. For good measure, you could have
> perf top or perf record running at the same time. Look for kernel errors,
> but also look for any evidence of your workload malfunctioning.
We currently run as part of CI several workloads[1], among them LTP tests[2],
and sometimes it's not pretty, because we encounter stability problems in
Graphene+SGX even without the patchset. We'll pick some stable subset and
will let know. Right now we'll have to retool CI for custom kernels, which
will take some back and forth with uni's admins.
[1] https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene/tree/master/Examples
[2] https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene/tree/master/LibOS/shim/test/ltp
--
pozdrawiam / best regards
Wojtek Porczyk
Graphene / Invisible Things Lab
I do not fear computers,
I fear lack of them.
-- Isaac Asimov
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists