[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200529153934.11694-25-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:39:28 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 24/30] KVM: nSVM: split nested_vmcb_check_controls
The authoritative state does not come from the VMCB once in guest mode,
but KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE can still perform checks on L1's provided SVM
controls because we get them from userspace.
Therefore, split out a function to do them.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 65ecc8586f75..bd3a89cd4070 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -203,26 +203,31 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return true;
}
-static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vmcb *vmcb)
+static bool nested_vmcb_check_controls(struct vmcb_control_area *control)
{
- if ((vmcb->save.efer & EFER_SVME) == 0)
+ if ((control->intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_VMRUN)) == 0)
return false;
- if (((vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_CD) == 0) &&
- (vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_NW))
+ if (control->asid == 0)
return false;
- if ((vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_VMRUN)) == 0)
+ if ((control->nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) &&
+ !npt_enabled)
return false;
- if (vmcb->control.asid == 0)
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vmcb *vmcb)
+{
+ if ((vmcb->save.efer & EFER_SVME) == 0)
return false;
- if ((vmcb->control.nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) &&
- !npt_enabled)
+ if (((vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_CD) == 0) &&
+ (vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_NW))
return false;
- return true;
+ return nested_vmcb_check_controls(&vmcb->control);
}
static void load_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists