[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a25489d-e496-d470-b99f-459630b1db44@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 08:44:27 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: bcm2835: Match BCM7211 compatible string
On 5/29/2020 6:11 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Am 28.05.20 um 21:21 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>> The BCM7211 SoC uses the same pinconf_ops as the ones defined for the
>> BCM2711 SoC, match the compatible string and use the correct set of
>> options.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
>> index 06bd2b70af3c..e8ad1824c6b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id bcm2835_pinctrl_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "brcm,bcm2711-gpio",
>> .data = &bcm2711_plat_data,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "brcm,bcm7211-gpio",
>> + .data = &bcm2711_pinconf_ops,
>
> this doesn't look safe. Maybe bcm2711_plat_data?
Whoops you are right, I sent an incorrect version.
>
> Looks like the original patch series based on a older version. Please
> double check this still applies since the introduction of 58 GPIO
> support for BCM2711.
We can use bcm2711_plat_data, thanks Stefan.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists