linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 18/41] media: atomisp: add more comments about frame allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <08a91029efbeccc3d7f9114bb435a02b67112ab8.1590821410.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 08:55:35 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/41] media: atomisp: add more comments about frame allocation

The frame allocation logic happens differently for userptr
or normal mmap. On a quick look, this sounded to be unbalanced,
but the logic should actually work for both cases.

Add an extra comment to reflect it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c
index 8783d4b59f6d..765e1a8c31fa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_ioctl.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ int __atomisp_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *fh,
 	atomisp_alloc_css_stat_bufs(asd, stream_id);
 
 	/*
-	 * for user pointer type, buffers are not really allcated here,
+	 * for user pointer type, buffers are not really allocated here,
 	 * buffers are setup in QBUF operation through v4l2_buffer structure
 	 */
 	if (req->memory == V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR)
@@ -1225,6 +1225,10 @@ static int atomisp_qbuf(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
 		buf->flags |= V4L2_BUF_FLAG_MAPPED;
 		buf->flags |= V4L2_BUF_FLAG_QUEUED;
 		buf->flags &= ~V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE;
+
+		/*
+		 * For mmap, frames were allocated at request buffers
+		 */
 	}
 
 done:
-- 
2.26.2