linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] orangefs: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89244e74-f619-e515-083a-3bf2586fa5c3@nvidia.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 00:39:22 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
        Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>,
        <devel@...ts.orangefs.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] orangefs: convert get_user_pages() -->
 pin_user_pages()

On 2020-05-22 20:59, John Hubbard wrote:
> This code was using get_user_pages*(), in a "Case 1" scenario
> (Direct IO), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
> time to convert the get_user_pages*() + put_page() calls to
> pin_user_pages*() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
> 
> There is some helpful background in [2]: basically, this is a small
> part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and
> file systems' use of those pages.
> 
> [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> 
> [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages":
>      https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/
> 
> Cc: Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
> Cc: Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>
> Cc: devel@...ts.orangefs.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Note that I have only compile-tested this patch, although that does
> also include cross-compiling for a few other arches.

An update on the run-time testing: Just now, I got basic orangefs tests
running in xfstests, with this patch applied, and it all looks normal.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

> 
> Changes since v1 [3]: correct the commit description, so that
> it refers to "Case 1" instead of "Case 2".
> 
> 
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200518060139.2828423-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
> 
> thanks,
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA
> 
>   fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c | 9 +++------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c
> index 2bb916d68576..538e839590ef 100644
> --- a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c
> +++ b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c
> @@ -168,10 +168,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(orangefs_bufmap_lock);
>   static void
>   orangefs_bufmap_unmap(struct orangefs_bufmap *bufmap)
>   {
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < bufmap->page_count; i++)
> -		put_page(bufmap->page_array[i]);
> +	unpin_user_pages(bufmap->page_array, bufmap->page_count);
>   }
>   
>   static void
> @@ -268,7 +265,7 @@ orangefs_bufmap_map(struct orangefs_bufmap *bufmap,
>   	int offset = 0, ret, i;
>   
>   	/* map the pages */
> -	ret = get_user_pages_fast((unsigned long)user_desc->ptr,
> +	ret = pin_user_pages_fast((unsigned long)user_desc->ptr,
>   			     bufmap->page_count, FOLL_WRITE, bufmap->page_array);
>   
>   	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -280,7 +277,7 @@ orangefs_bufmap_map(struct orangefs_bufmap *bufmap,
>   
>   		for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
>   			SetPageError(bufmap->page_array[i]);
> -			put_page(bufmap->page_array[i]);
> +			unpin_user_page(bufmap->page_array[i]);
>   		}
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>