[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159082479973.17951.9993643934969577423.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 07:46:39 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Ingo Rohloff" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@...terbach.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix missing "__init" for gic_smp_init()
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 8a94c1ab34d53476617f83610521cfb6674db8d4
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/8a94c1ab34d53476617f83610521cfb6674db8d4
Author: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@...terbach.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:28:57 +02:00
Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:28:30 +01:00
irqchip/gic-v3: Fix missing "__init" for gic_smp_init()
With an SMP configuration, gic_smp_init() calls set_smp_cross_call().
set_smp_cross_call() is marked with "__init".
So gic_smp_init() should also be marked with "__init".
gic_smp_init() is only called from gic_init_bases().
gic_init_bases() is also marked with "__init";
So marking gic_smp_init() with "__init" is fine.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@...terbach.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200422112857.4300-1-ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index d7006ef..98c886d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
isb();
}
-static void gic_smp_init(void)
+static void __init gic_smp_init(void)
{
set_smp_cross_call(gic_raise_softirq);
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_IRQ_GIC_STARTING,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists