[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEBcH4eW9dL95mfwTTUArxZxmWdjcqmzVeXjUPzat0YeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 10:51:32 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 10:41, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:01:55AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 01:23, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ard,
> > >
> > > Please take a look. Obviously, whatever the resolution is going to be
> > > needed when Linus opens the merge window.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for that.
> >
> > I have pushed the signed tag below to resolve it. Those changes were
> > already in v5.7-rc2, so I wouldn't expect this to cause more trouble.
> > If you prefer, you could merge v5.7-rc2 into your tree directly
> > instead.
>
> In light of Stephen's report of a different conflict on the 29th, I
> haven't pulled this. I don't know if that's a side effect of this
> change having been picked up by -next or not.
>
Fair enough. Both conflicts are unambiguous and self explanatory so I
don't think it should be a problem, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists