lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 10:51:32 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree

On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 10:41, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:01:55AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 01:23, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ard,
> > >
> > > Please take a look.  Obviously, whatever the resolution is going to be
> > > needed when Linus opens the merge window.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for that.
> >
> > I have pushed the signed tag below to resolve it. Those changes were
> > already in v5.7-rc2, so I wouldn't expect this to cause more trouble.
> > If you prefer, you could merge v5.7-rc2 into your tree directly
> > instead.
>
> In light of Stephen's report of a different conflict on the 29th, I
> haven't pulled this.  I don't know if that's a side effect of this
> change having been picked up by -next or not.
>

Fair enough. Both conflicts are unambiguous and self explanatory so I
don't think it should be a problem, right?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ