[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200530102419.gtgh77eaxoort3zh@mobilestation>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 13:24:19 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Convert DW I2C binding to DT
schema
Hello Wolfram
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> Just double checking:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> Rob, what about this checkpatch warning?
>
> WARNING: DT binding documents should be licensed (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>
Hope you don't mind me answering on a question for Rob. That warning concerns
new bindings and bindings converted by a person eligible to change the license.
Otherwise by default any converted binding is supposed to be left under pure
GPL as the rest of kernel code.
-Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists