lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 09:41:11 -0700 From: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Simon Arlott <simon@...iron.net>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...hive.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: sr: Fix sr_probe() missing mutex_destroy On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 09:24 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-05-30 02:32, Simon Arlott wrote: > > If the device minor cannot be allocated or the cdrom fails to be > > registered then the mutex should be destroyed. > > Please add Fixes: and Cc: stable tags. This isn't really a bug, is it? mutex_destroy is a nop unless lock debugging is enabled in which case it checks the lock is unlocked and marks it as unusable to detect a use after destroy. Since the structure containing the mutex is kfree'd in the next statement, kasan would also detect any use after free. That's not to say we shouldn't do this to be fully correct ... just that it has no potential ever to have user visible impact so there doesn't seem to be much point cluttering up the stable process with it. James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists