[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vev_a_VrjoLUxfNo3AZybSteuV28t2EChaqydeFjCq=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 00:56:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: make a test module with get_count_order/long
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:23 AM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 01:25:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:43:28AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> A test module to make sure get_count_order/long returns the correct result.
> >
> >> lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 ++++++
> >> lib/Makefile | 2 +
> >> lib/test_getorder.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >I didn't get why it's not a part of test_bitops?
> >
>
> I see the document of test_bitops says it does exercise on clear_bit and
> set_bit. So not sure it is proper to put them together.
It's not a problem to amend a documentation as well :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists