[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c8cab08-e2d4-1952-1923-aa023ea67657@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 08:33:50 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lost PCIe PME after a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't select
CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default")
On 30.05.2020 00:58, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:26:17AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>
>> Current situation means that PME is unusable on all systems where
>> pcie_aspm_support_enabled() returns false, what is basically every
>> system except EXPERT mode is enabled and CONFIG_PCIEASPM is set.
>> So we definitely need to do something.
>
> CONFIG_PCIEASPM is default y. I don't think there's huge value in
> adding complexity to deal with it being disabled, given that the kernel
> is then in a configuration that no vendor is testing against. There are
> existing runtime mechanisms to disable it at runtime.
>
>
It *was* default y. This changed with a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't
select CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default") and that's what triggered the
problem. If there's no easy solution, then maybe it's best to revert
the change for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists