| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200531115031.391515-4-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 13:50:31 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Chris Palmer <palmer@...gle.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>,
Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] tests: test seccomp filter notifications
This verifies we're correctly notified when a seccomp filter becomes
unused when a notifier is in use.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
---
/* v2 */
unchanged
/* v3 */
At first it seemed sensible to add POLLHUP to all poll invocations but
all checks test for revents to be equal to POLLIN. Hence, when POLLHUP
is reported we'd fail the test so we don't gain anyhing by testing for
POLLHUP additionally.
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index c0aa46ce14f6..4dae278cf77e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
#include <poll.h>
#include "../kselftest_harness.h"
+#include "../clone3/clone3_selftests.h"
#ifndef PR_SET_PTRACER
# define PR_SET_PTRACER 0x59616d61
@@ -3686,6 +3687,141 @@ TEST(user_notification_continue)
}
}
+TEST(user_notification_filter_empty)
+{
+ pid_t pid;
+ long ret;
+ int status;
+ struct pollfd pollfd;
+ struct clone_args args = {
+ .flags = CLONE_FILES,
+ .exit_signal = SIGCHLD,
+ };
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
+ pid = sys_clone3(&args, sizeof(args));
+ ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ int listener;
+
+ listener = user_trap_syscall(__NR_mknod, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER);
+ if (listener < 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (dup2(listener, 200) != 200)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ close(listener);
+
+ _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+
+ /*
+ * The seccomp filter has become unused so we should be notified once
+ * the kernel gets around to cleaning up task struct.
+ */
+ pollfd.fd = 200;
+ pollfd.events = POLLHUP;
+
+ EXPECT_GT(poll(&pollfd, 1, -1), 0);
+ EXPECT_GT((pollfd.revents & POLLHUP) ?: 0, 0);
+}
+
+static void *do_thread(void *data)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+TEST(user_notification_filter_empty_threaded)
+{
+ pid_t pid;
+ long ret;
+ int status;
+ struct pollfd pollfd;
+ struct clone_args args = {
+ .flags = CLONE_FILES,
+ .exit_signal = SIGCHLD,
+ };
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
+ pid = sys_clone3(&args, sizeof(args));
+ ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ pid_t pid1, pid2;
+ int listener, status;
+ pthread_t thread;
+
+ listener = user_trap_syscall(__NR_dup, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER);
+ if (listener < 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (dup2(listener, 200) != 200)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ close(listener);
+
+ pid1 = fork();
+ if (pid1 < 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (pid1 == 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+
+ pid2 = fork();
+ if (pid2 < 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (pid2 == 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+
+ if (pthread_create(&thread, NULL, do_thread, NULL) ||
+ pthread_join(thread, NULL))
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (pthread_create(&thread, NULL, do_thread, NULL) ||
+ pthread_join(thread, NULL))
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (waitpid(pid1, &status, 0) != pid1 || !WIFEXITED(status) ||
+ WEXITSTATUS(status))
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ if (waitpid(pid2, &status, 0) != pid2 || !WIFEXITED(status) ||
+ WEXITSTATUS(status))
+ _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+
+ exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+
+ /*
+ * The seccomp filter has become unused so we should be notified once
+ * the kernel gets around to cleaning up task struct.
+ */
+ pollfd.fd = 200;
+ pollfd.events = POLLHUP;
+
+ EXPECT_GT(poll(&pollfd, 1, -1), 0);
+ EXPECT_GT((pollfd.revents & POLLHUP) ?: 0, 0);
+}
+
/*
* TODO:
* - add microbenchmarks
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists