linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 22:20:25 -0500
From:   Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing
>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many
>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity
>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For
>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org.
> 
> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be
> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with
> the clean-up of arch/sh.

Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes
about last -rc7 (in march)?

https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2

Rob