linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v25 03/16] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200531190625.GA30537@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sun, 31 May 2020 21:06:25 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/16] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx
 family of RGB drivers

Hi!

> > > +          There can only be one instance of the ti,led-bank
> > > +          property for each device node.  This is a required node is the LED
> > > +          modules are to be backed.
> > I don't understand the second sentence. Pretty sure it is not valid
> > english.
> 
> 
> If I make these changes is this still viable for 5.8 or would you then go
> into 5.9?

It really depends if we get -rc8 or not, and if you'll need to do any
changes to C code or not...

Best regards,

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)