[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200531231227.GA236202@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:12:27 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
kai.svahn@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, josh@...htriplett.org,
luto@...nel.org, kai.huang@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
cedric.xing@...el.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v30 09/20] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect()
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:28:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/14/20 5:43 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> >
> > Add vm_ops()->may_mprotect() to check additional constrains set by a
> > subsystem for a mprotect() call.
>
> This changelog needs some more detail about why this is needed. It
> would also be nice to include thought about what else it could get used
> for and what subsystems can expect by doing this and what the mm core is
> expected to do.
Point taken. I added a description on how it is used.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists