[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <845a11a9-51ed-cc7c-350f-b319111f32ee@web.de>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 09:01:38 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-imx@....com
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error in
lpi2c_imx_master_enable()
> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> the call returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed
> on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
* How do you think about to replace the word “pairing” by “corresponding”?
* Will it be helpful to add an imperative wording?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=ffeb595d84811dde16a28b33d8a7cf26d51d51b3#n151
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
* Are you going to take such possibilities into account for any more patches?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists