lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200601174052.394180342@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Jun 2020 19:55:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 142/142] perf: Make perf able to build with latest libbfd

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>

commit 0ada120c883d4f1f6aafd01cf0fbb10d8bbba015 upstream.

libbfd has changed the bfd_section_* macros to inline functions
bfd_section_<field> since 2019-09-18. See below two commits:
  o http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2019-09/msg00064.html
  o https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2019-09/msg00072.html

This fix make perf able to build with both old and new libbfd.

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200128152938.31413-1-changbin.du@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/srcline.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
@@ -193,16 +193,30 @@ static void find_address_in_section(bfd
 	bfd_vma pc, vma;
 	bfd_size_type size;
 	struct a2l_data *a2l = data;
+	flagword flags;
 
 	if (a2l->found)
 		return;
 
-	if ((bfd_get_section_flags(abfd, section) & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
+#ifdef bfd_get_section_flags
+	flags = bfd_get_section_flags(abfd, section);
+#else
+	flags = bfd_section_flags(section);
+#endif
+	if ((flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
 		return;
 
 	pc = a2l->addr;
+#ifdef bfd_get_section_vma
 	vma = bfd_get_section_vma(abfd, section);
+#else
+	vma = bfd_section_vma(section);
+#endif
+#ifdef bfd_get_section_size
 	size = bfd_get_section_size(section);
+#else
+	size = bfd_section_size(section);
+#endif
 
 	if (pc < vma || pc >= vma + size)
 		return;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ