linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 07:38:09 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        vinod.koul@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de,
        broonie@...nel.org, jank@...ence.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, rander.wang@...ux.intel.com,
        ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, mengdong.lin@...el.com,
        bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: clarify SPDX use of GPL-2.0

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 01:28:07AM +0800, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Change SPDX from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only for Intel-contributed
> code. This was explicit before the transition to SPDX and lost in
> translation.

It is also explicit in the "GPL-2.0" lines as well, did you read the
LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 file for the allowed tags to be used for this
license?

So this doesn't change anything, and we are trying to cut down on this
type of churn until, maybe, after the whole kernel has proper SPDX
lines.

thanks,

greg k-h