linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3=XjLvQYz2xB_1=XHFb34Q6zhAJbpJEDRUPX_r=kEBRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:17 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:13 PM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:08:09AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > [PATCH next] sh: remove call to memset after dma_alloc_coherent
> > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=157793031102356&w=2
>
> Can anyone confirm that this is correct/safe?

Yes, this is safe, I checked both the API definition and the sh
implementation in arch_dma_alloc(), which passes __GFP_ZERO.

       Arnd