linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation for 5.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiNQwW8LEb-ZDFuYphFxuJW0+tzE1jsYC64LQeGjB7aHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:52:27 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation for 5.8

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> There will be, alas, more of the usual trivial merge conflicts.

Heh. And one of those conflicts was just due to the arm64 people
fixing some warnings differently from the doc people.

I took the doc version that kept the allegedly "unexpected
indentation", and fixed it by just adding the proper blank lines. That
seemed to be the more sphinx-aware fix.

Funnily enough, the commit from the arm64 tree that re-indented those
lines _also_ added the blank lines, so that's presumably what really
fixed the warning, and the re-indentation was just due to the warning
language implying it was needed.

             Linus