[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc4c04fb-ec9a-e9c6-96ec-c8edb8955815@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:20:41 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/33] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code
Hi Jerry,
On 6/1/20 9:17 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Mon Jun 01 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> On Fri May 29 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>> On Tue Apr 14 20, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> here is the second version of this patch-set. The first version with
>>>> some more introductory text can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200407183742.4344-1-joro@8bytes.org/
>>>>
>>>> Changes v1->v2:
>>>>
>>>> * Rebased to v5.7-rc1
>>>>
>>>> * Re-wrote the arm-smmu changes as suggested by Robin Murphy
>>>>
>>>> * Re-worked the Exynos patches to hopefully not break the
>>>> driver anymore
>>>>
>>>> * Fixed a missing mutex_unlock() reported by Marek Szyprowski,
>>>> thanks for that.
>>>>
>>>> There is also a git-branch available with these patches applied:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/linux.git/log/?h=iommu-probe-device-v2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please review.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Joerg
>>>>
>>>> Joerg Roedel (32):
>>>> iommu: Move default domain allocation to separate function
>>>> iommu/amd: Implement iommu_ops->def_domain_type call-back
>>>> iommu/vt-d: Wire up iommu_ops->def_domain_type
>>>> iommu/amd: Remove dma_mask check from check_device()
>>>> iommu/amd: Return -ENODEV in add_device when device is not handled by
>>>> IOMMU
>>>> iommu: Add probe_device() and remove_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu: Move default domain allocation to iommu_probe_device()
>>>> iommu: Keep a list of allocated groups in __iommu_probe_device()
>>>> iommu: Move new probe_device path to separate function
>>>> iommu: Split off default domain allocation from group assignment
>>>> iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings() out of
>>>> iommu_group_add_device()
>>>> iommu: Export bus_iommu_probe() and make is safe for re-probing
>>>> iommu/amd: Remove dev_data->passthrough
>>>> iommu/amd: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/vt-d: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/pamu: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/s390: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/virtio: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/msm: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/mediatek: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/mediatek-v1 Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/qcom: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/rockchip: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/tegra: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/renesas: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/omap: Remove orphan_dev tracking
>>>> iommu/omap: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu/exynos: Use first SYSMMU in controllers list for IOMMU core
>>>> iommu/exynos: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
>>>> iommu: Remove add_device()/remove_device() code-paths
>>>> iommu: Unexport iommu_group_get_for_dev()
>>>>
>>>> Sai Praneeth Prakhya (1):
>>>> iommu: Add def_domain_type() callback in iommu_ops
>>>>
>>>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 97 ++++----
>>>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h | 1 -
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 38 +--
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 39 ++--
>>>> drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 24 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c | 22 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 68 +-----
>>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 393 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 60 ++---
>>>> drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 34 +--
>>>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 24 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 50 ++--
>>>> drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 99 ++------
>>>> drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c | 24 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 26 +--
>>>> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 22 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 24 +-
>>>> drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 31 +--
>>>> drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 41 +---
>>>> include/linux/iommu.h | 21 +-
>>>> 20 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 605 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> iommu mailing list
>>>> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>
>>> With this patchset, I have an epyc system where if I boot with
>>> iommu=nopt and force a dump I will see some io page faults for a nic
>>> on the system. The vmcore is harvested and the system reboots. I
>>> haven't reproduced it on other systems yet, but without the patchset I
>>> don't see the io page faults during the kdump.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jerry
>>
>> I just hit an issue on a separate intel based system (kdump iommu=nopt),
>> where it panics in during intel_iommu_attach_device, in is_aux_domain,
>> due to device_domain_info being DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO. That doesn't
>> get set to a valid address until the domain_add_dev_info call.
>>
>> Is it as simple as the following?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index 29d3940847d3..f1bbeed46a4c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -5053,8 +5053,8 @@ is_aux_domain(struct device *dev, struct
>> iommu_domain *domain)
>> {
>> struct device_domain_info *info = dev->archdata.iommu;
>> - return info && info->auxd_enabled &&
>> - domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
>> + return info && info != DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO &&
>> + info->auxd_enabled && domain->type ==
>> IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
>> }
>> static void auxiliary_link_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jerry
>>
>
> With the patch, I avoid the panic, but I'm seeing an issue similar to
> the epyc system.
> I'm getting dmar faults from a couple of nics and the hp ilo. The
> addresses in question
> were in e820 reserved sections, but there aren't rmrr covering those
> addresses. The system
> manages to harvest the vmcore and reboot like the epyc. Without the
> patches I don't see
> the dmar faults. I needed to give this system back, but I'll try to poke
> at it some more
> in the next couple of days.
Thanks and looking forward to further debugging information.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists