lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:27:49 +0300
From:   Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmem: add ONIE NVMEM cells support

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/06/2020 10:03, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +	nvmem = of_nvmem_device_get(np, NULL);
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
> > > > +		return PTR_ERR(nvmem);
> > > > +
> > > TBH, this looks completely incorrect way to do this and misuse of nvmem
> > > consumer interface.
> > > 
> > > Ideally nvmem provider driver should populate "cells" in struct nvmem_config
> > > after decoding them and then register nvmem provider.
> > > 
> > > That should just work!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --srini
> > But this is not nvmem provider but just describes the cells for any
> > nvmem device, because ONIE uses special TLV structure on the nvmem
> > device. So from the nvmem device point it is a consumer but provides the cells
> > for the given device.
> 
> That still falls under nvmem providers responsibility to parse these cells
> before registering it.
OK, I thought that it is legal to have separate nvmem driver which
provides access to the device itself, and other driver which describes the
layout of the cells which might be applicable to any nvmem.

> 
> BTW, where is the provider driver for this in kernel ?
> 
> 
> --srini
> 
> > 
One of the example is atmel eeprom (at24), but there might be different
devices.

But can you please explain what is the technical/conceptual issue with
this approach ?

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ