[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200601110116.jteoalg3yjhsbkpw@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:31:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
mka@...omium.org, nm@...com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
lukasz.luba@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, smasetty@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] cpufreq: qcom: Update the bandwidth levels on
frequency change
On 29-05-20, 17:00, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > > +static int qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > + unsigned long freq_khz,
> > > + unsigned long volt)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long freq_hz = freq_khz * 1000;
> > > +
> > > + if (dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt, volt, volt))
> > > + return dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt);
> >
> > What's going on here ? Why add OPP here ?
>
> We update the voltage if opp were
> initially added as part of
> dev_pm_opp_of_add_table. However
> if the cpu node does not have an
> opp table associated with it, we
> do a opp_add_v1 instead.
Instead of depending on the failure of dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(),
pass a flag to qcom_cpufreq_update_opp() which will decide if we want
to adjust voltage or add an opp.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists