[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c32541a5-2dce-1fb2-7f3d-dfe03bcfb52c@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:12:50 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>, mbrugger@...e.com,
u-boot@...ts.denx.de, bmeng.cn@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sjg@...omium.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
mark.kettenis@...all.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] usb: xhci: Load Raspberry Pi 4 VL805's firmware
On 6/1/20 1:09 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 12:53 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 6/1/20 12:47 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 18:26 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>>> Newer revisions of the RPi4 need their xHCI chip, VL805, firmware to be
>>>> loaded explicitly. Earlier versions didn't need that as they where using
>>>> an EEPROM for that purpose. This series takes care of setting up the
>>>> relevant infrastructure and run the firmware loading routine at the
>>>> right moment.
>>>>
>>>> Note that this builds on top of Sylwester Nawrocki's "USB host support
>>>> for Raspberry Pi 4 board" series.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please don't forget about this series. The new 8GB RPi4 contains this HW
>>> design
>>> change and USB will not work without it. See this discussion on the
>>> downstream
>>> kernel github, where other OS/bootloaders are hitting the issue:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1402
>>>
>>> Otherwise, the Linux version of this is already in linux-next:
>>>
>>>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c?h=next-20200529&id=c65822fef4adc0ba40c37a47337376ce75f7a7bc
>>
>> We're already at 2020.07-rc3 , so unless this is a bugfix (does not look
>> that way), this will have to wait for next release cycle.
>
> Of course. As long as it eventually gets in I'm happy (not implying this
> specific series is flawless, but the overall mechanism). I'm just worried this
> gets lost.
>
>> Also, it seems
>> there was a lengthy ongoing discussion, is that already sorted out ?
>
> Well, there was some discussion on how to incorporate the platform specific
> callback into XCHI's code. Which this revision of the series addresses. But,
> IIRC, that's pretty much it as far as discussion is concerned.
Oh, right, since the firmware loading hook looks like a reset hook, why
isn't that implemented via reset controller API instead ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists