linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 04/11] pwm: clps711x: Use 64-bit division macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:33:28 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 04/11] pwm: clps711x: Use 64-bit division macro

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:33:41PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:35:04AM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_args.period's datatype
> > to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST to
> > handle a 64-bit divisor.
> > 
> > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> > index 924d39a..ba9500a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
> > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void clps711x_pwm_update_val(struct clps711x_chip *priv, u32 n, u32 v)
> >  static unsigned int clps711x_get_duty(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int v)
> >  {
> >  	/* Duty cycle 0..15 max */
> > -	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
> > +	return DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int clps711x_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > -- 
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Could you please review this patch when you get a chance to?

I don't normally review PWM patches... but this no longer has the bug
there was there when I first read this patch.


Daniel.