lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 01 Jun 2020 08:27:32 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 03/12] tracing/probe: reverse arguments to list_add

From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>

Elsewhere in the file, the function trace_kprobe_has_same_kprobe uses
a trace_probe_event.probes object as the second argument of
list_for_each_entry, ie as a list head, while the list_for_each_entry
iterates over the list fields of the trace_probe structures, making
them the list elements.  So, exchange the arguments on the list_add
call to put the list head in the second argument.

Since both list_head structures were just initialized, this problem
did not cause any loss of information.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1588879808-24488-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr

Fixes: 60d53e2c3b75 ("tracing/probe: Split trace_event related data from trace_probe")
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
index ab8b6436d53f..b8a928e925c7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ int trace_probe_init(struct trace_probe *tp, const char *event,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tp->event->class.fields);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tp->event->probes);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tp->list);
-	list_add(&tp->event->probes, &tp->list);
+	list_add(&tp->list, &tp->event->probes);
 
 	call = trace_probe_event_call(tp);
 	call->class = &tp->event->class;
-- 
2.26.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ