[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200601130905.GA1031432@krava>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:09:05 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] perf tests: Add parse metric test for ipc metric
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:43 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Adding new test that process metrics code and checks
> > the expected results. Starting with easy ipc metric.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> I wonder if there's a better organization with testing in
> pmu-events.c, expr.c and now parse-metric.c.
hum, so
- expr.c is testing core interface,
- parse-metric is testing specific metric processing from
parsing to final ratio
- pmu-events.c is testing pmu events aliases and parsing of
all the metrics
pmu-events.c is testing both pmu events and metrics,
but I think it fits in the way it's done together
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists