| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200601022301.GA796332@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 05:23:01 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: amirmizi6@...il.com
Cc: Eyal.Cohen@...oton.com, oshrialkoby85@...il.com,
alexander.steffen@...ineon.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
peterhuewe@....de, christophe-h.richard@...com, jgg@...pe.ca,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@...oton.com,
tmaimon77@...il.com, gcwilson@...ibm.com, kgoldman@...ibm.com,
Dan.Morav@...oton.com, oren.tanami@...oton.com,
shmulik.hager@...oton.com, amir.mizinski@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] tpm: tpm_tis: Make implementation of read16,
read32 and write32 optional
Plese, write the short summary as
tpm: Make read{16, 32}() and write32() in tpm_tis_phy_ops optional
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:16:51PM +0300, amirmizi6@...il.com wrote:
> From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
>
> Only tpm_tis can use memory-mapped I/O, which is truly mapped into
> the kernel's memory space. Therefore, using ioread16/ioread32/iowrite32
> turns into a straightforward pointer dereference.
> Every other driver requires more complicated operations to read more than
> one byte at a time and will just fall back to read_bytes/write_bytes.
> Therefore, move this common code out of tpm_tis_spi and into tpm_tis_core
> so that it is used automatically when low-level drivers do not implement
> the specialized methods.
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h | 4 ----
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c | 3 ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 41 -------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> index 7337819..d06c65b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> @@ -122,13 +122,35 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_read8(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 *result)
> static inline int tpm_tis_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> u16 *result)
> {
> - return data->phy_ops->read16(data, addr, result);
> + __le16 result_le;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (data->phy_ops->read16)
> + return data->phy_ops->read16(data, addr, result);
> +
> + rc = data->phy_ops->read_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u16),
> + (u8 *)&result_le);
> + if (!rc)
> + *result = le16_to_cpu(result_le);
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static inline int tpm_tis_read32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> u32 *result)
> {
> - return data->phy_ops->read32(data, addr, result);
> + __le32 result_le;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (data->phy_ops->read32)
> + return data->phy_ops->read32(data, addr, result);
> +
> + rc = data->phy_ops->read_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u32),
> + (u8 *)&result_le);
> + if (!rc)
> + *result = le32_to_cpu(result_le);
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static inline int tpm_tis_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> @@ -145,7 +167,17 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_write8(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 value)
> static inline int tpm_tis_write32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> u32 value)
> {
> - return data->phy_ops->write32(data, addr, value);
> + __le32 value_le;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (data->phy_ops->write32)
> + return data->phy_ops->write32(data, addr, value);
> +
> + value_le = cpu_to_le32(value);
> + rc = data->phy_ops->write_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u32),
> + (u8 *)&value_le);
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static inline bool is_bsw(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h
> index bba7397..d0f66f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h
> @@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ extern int tpm_tis_spi_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy,
> extern int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> u8 *in, const u8 *out);
>
> -extern int tpm_tis_spi_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result);
> -extern int tpm_tis_spi_read32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 *result);
> -extern int tpm_tis_spi_write32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 value);
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI_CR50
> extern int cr50_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi);
> #else
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
> index 37d72e8..f339d20 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
> @@ -215,9 +215,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_cr50_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops tpm_spi_cr50_phy_ops = {
> .read_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_cr50_read_bytes,
> .write_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_cr50_write_bytes,
> - .read16 = tpm_tis_spi_read16,
> - .read32 = tpm_tis_spi_read32,
> - .write32 = tpm_tis_spi_write32,
> };
>
> static void cr50_print_fw_version(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> index d1754fd..95fef9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> @@ -152,44 +152,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, NULL, value);
> }
>
> -int tpm_tis_spi_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result)
> -{
> - __le16 result_le;
> - int rc;
> -
> - rc = data->phy_ops->read_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u16),
> - (u8 *)&result_le);
> - if (!rc)
> - *result = le16_to_cpu(result_le);
> -
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -int tpm_tis_spi_read32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 *result)
> -{
> - __le32 result_le;
> - int rc;
> -
> - rc = data->phy_ops->read_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u32),
> - (u8 *)&result_le);
> - if (!rc)
> - *result = le32_to_cpu(result_le);
> -
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> -int tpm_tis_spi_write32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 value)
> -{
> - __le32 value_le;
> - int rc;
> -
> - value_le = cpu_to_le32(value);
> - rc = data->phy_ops->write_bytes(data, addr, sizeof(u32),
> - (u8 *)&value_le);
> -
> - return rc;
> -}
> -
> int tpm_tis_spi_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy,
> int irq, const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops)
> {
> @@ -205,9 +167,6 @@ int tpm_tis_spi_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy,
> static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops tpm_spi_phy_ops = {
> .read_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes,
> .write_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes,
> - .read16 = tpm_tis_spi_read16,
> - .read32 = tpm_tis_spi_read32,
> - .write32 = tpm_tis_spi_write32,
> };
>
> static int tpm_tis_spi_probe(struct spi_device *dev)
> --
> 2.7.4
Other than that looks good.
/Jarkko
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists