[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc1JN4yOi5jkMkGj=POqbtXmz+N+Yr9yyhgBnSfQ3YAZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:51:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] leds: fix broken devres usage
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:42 PM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Several MFD child drivers register their class devices directly under
> the parent device (about half of the MFD LED drivers do so).
>
> This means you cannot blindly do devres conversions so that
> deregistration ends up being tied to the parent device, something which
> leads to use-after-free on driver unbind when the class device is
> released while still being registered (and, for example, oopses on later
> parent MFD driver unbind or LED class callbacks, or resource leaks and
> name clashes on child driver reload).
Shouldn't MFD take reference count for their children?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists