linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b24101f1-c468-8f6b-9dcb-6dc59d0cd4b9@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:14:53 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/1/20 7:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> with Linux v5.7 final I switched to linux-block.git/for-next and reverted...
>>>
>>> "block: read-ahead submission should imply no-wait as well"
>>>
>>> ...and see no boot-slowdowns.
>>
>> Can you try with these patches applied instead? Or pull my async-readahead
>> branch from the same location.
>>
> 
> Yes, I can do that.
> I pulled from linux-block.git#async-readahead and will report later.
> 
> Any specific testing desired by you?

Just do your boot timing test and see if it works, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe