linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <455dd2c1-7346-2d43-4266-1367c368cee1@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:35:01 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

On 6/1/20 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/1/20 7:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> with Linux v5.7 final I switched to linux-block.git/for-next and reverted...
>>>>
>>>> "block: read-ahead submission should imply no-wait as well"
>>>>
>>>> ...and see no boot-slowdowns.
>>>
>>> Can you try with these patches applied instead? Or pull my async-readahead
>>> branch from the same location.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I can do that.
>> I pulled from linux-block.git#async-readahead and will report later.
>>
>> Any specific testing desired by you?
> 
> Just do your boot timing test and see if it works, thanks.

Actually, can you just re-test with the current async-buffered.6 branch?
I think the major surgery should wait for 5.9, we can do this a bit
easier without having to touch everything around us.

-- 
Jens Axboe