[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200601165736.qw5kwwknxltk7bv6@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:57:36 -0400
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, hughd@...gle.com,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstat: Add events for PMD based THP migration
without split
Hi Anshuman,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:04:04AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds the following two new VM events which will help in validating PMD
> based THP migration without split. Statistics reported through these events
> will help in performance debugging.
>
> 1. THP_PMD_MIGRATION_SUCCESS
> 2. THP_PMD_MIGRATION_FAILURE
The names suggest a binary event similar to the existing
pgmigrate_success/fail, but FAILURE only tracks one kind of migration error,
and then only when the thp is successfully split, so shouldn't it be called
SPLIT instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists