linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 03/61] net: revert "net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200601174012.043632287@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Jun 2020 19:53:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Jiong Wang <jiongwang@...wei.com>,
        Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>,
        Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 03/61] net: revert "net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents_reserve()"

From: Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit a6211caa634da39d861a47437ffcda8b38ef421b ]

Commit adb03115f459 ("net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents_reserve()")
used atomic_cmpxchg to replace "atomic_add_return" inside the function
"ip_idents_reserve". The reason was to avoid UBSAN warning.
However, this change has caused performance degrade and in GCC-8,
fno-strict-overflow is now mapped to -fwrapv -fwrapv-pointer
and signed integer overflow is now undefined by default at all
optimization levels[1]. Moreover, it was a bug in UBSAN vs -fwrapv
/-fno-strict-overflow, so Let's revert it safely.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/changes.html

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiong Wang <jiongwang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c |   14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -477,18 +477,16 @@ u32 ip_idents_reserve(u32 hash, int segs
 	atomic_t *p_id = ip_idents + hash % IP_IDENTS_SZ;
 	u32 old = ACCESS_ONCE(*p_tstamp);
 	u32 now = (u32)jiffies;
-	u32 new, delta = 0;
+	u32 delta = 0;
 
 	if (old != now && cmpxchg(p_tstamp, old, now) == old)
 		delta = prandom_u32_max(now - old);
 
-	/* Do not use atomic_add_return() as it makes UBSAN unhappy */
-	do {
-		old = (u32)atomic_read(p_id);
-		new = old + delta + segs;
-	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(p_id, old, new) != old);
-
-	return new - segs;
+	/* If UBSAN reports an error there, please make sure your compiler
+	 * supports -fno-strict-overflow before reporting it that was a bug
+	 * in UBSAN, and it has been fixed in GCC-8.
+	 */
+	return atomic_add_return(segs + delta, p_id) - segs;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_idents_reserve);