linux-kernel - [PATCH] misc: atmel-ssc: lock with mutex instead of spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <c18a68b3b7c25593c9b6db4bcea1d53de469f6e0.1590983023.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date:   Mon, 01 Jun 2020 05:45:48 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] misc: atmel-ssc: lock with mutex instead of spinlock

Uninterruptible context is not needed in the driver and causes lockdep
warning because of mutex taken in of_alias_get_id(). Convert the lock to
mutex to avoid the issue.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
---
 drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
index 1322e29bc37a..5cc032097476 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/atmel-ssc.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include "../../sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.h"
 
 /* Serialize access to ssc_list and user count */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(user_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(user_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(ssc_list);
 
 struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
 	int ssc_valid = 0;
 	struct ssc_device *ssc;
 
-	spin_lock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&user_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(ssc, &ssc_list, list) {
 		if (ssc->pdev->dev.of_node) {
 			if (of_alias_get_id(ssc->pdev->dev.of_node, "ssc")
@@ -44,18 +44,18 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
 	}
 
 	if (!ssc_valid) {
-		spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 		pr_err("ssc: ssc%d platform device is missing\n", ssc_num);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 	}
 
 	if (ssc->user) {
-		spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 		dev_dbg(&ssc->pdev->dev, "module busy\n");
 		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 	}
 	ssc->user++;
-	spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 
 	clk_prepare(ssc->clk);
 
@@ -67,14 +67,14 @@ void ssc_free(struct ssc_device *ssc)
 {
 	bool disable_clk = true;
 
-	spin_lock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&user_lock);
 	if (ssc->user)
 		ssc->user--;
 	else {
 		disable_clk = false;
 		dev_dbg(&ssc->pdev->dev, "device already free\n");
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 
 	if (disable_clk)
 		clk_unprepare(ssc->clk);
@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&user_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&ssc->list, &ssc_list);
-	spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ssc);
 
@@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ static int ssc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ssc_sound_dai_remove(ssc);
 
-	spin_lock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&user_lock);
 	list_del(&ssc->list);
-	spin_unlock(&user_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1