linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] kdb: Re-factor kdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WVdRcvfR-O-A2809AqFggqhJmvrTSo9qafxq=DgSbLrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:32:03 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] kdb: Re-factor kdb_printf() message write code

Hi,

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:27 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Re-factor kdb_printf() message write code in order to avoid duplication
> of code and thereby increase readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
> index 924bc92..e46f33e 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
> +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
> @@ -542,6 +542,33 @@ static int kdb_search_string(char *searched, char *searchfor)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static void kdb_io_write(char *cp, int len)

nit: "const char *" just to make it obvious that we don't modify the string?


> +{
> +       if (len == 0)
> +               return;

Remove the above check.  It's double-overkill.  Not only did you just
check in kdb_msg_write() but also the while loop below will do a
"no-op" just fine even without your check.


> +
> +       while (len--) {
> +               dbg_io_ops->write_char(*cp);
> +               cp++;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void kdb_msg_write(char *msg, int msg_len)

nit: "const char *" just to make it obvious that we don't modify the string?


Other than those small things, this looks nice to me.  Feel free to
add my Reviewed-by tag once small things are fixed.


-Doug