| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:31:16 -0700
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
To: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v16 11/11] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64
Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the
PWM framework so that higher durations may be set.
Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c as
well as pwm-stm32-lp.c.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/pwm.h | 12 ++++++------
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index bca0496..a2ff6dd 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -510,12 +510,12 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
last->period > s2.period &&
last->period <= state->period)
dev_warn(chip->dev,
- ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %u, applied: %u, possible: %u)\n",
+ ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n",
state->period, s2.period, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period)
dev_warn(chip->dev,
- ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %u, applied: %u)\n",
+ ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n",
state->period, s2.period);
if (state->enabled &&
@@ -524,14 +524,14 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle &&
last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle)
dev_warn(chip->dev,
- ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u, possible: %u/%u)\n",
+ ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n",
state->duty_cycle, state->period,
s2.duty_cycle, s2.period,
last->duty_cycle, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle)
dev_warn(chip->dev,
- ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u)\n",
+ ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n",
state->duty_cycle, state->period,
s2.duty_cycle, s2.period);
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
(s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) ||
(s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) {
dev_err(chip->dev,
- ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u)\n",
+ ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n",
s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period,
last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle,
last->period);
@@ -1284,8 +1284,8 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s)
if (state.enabled)
seq_puts(s, " enabled");
- seq_printf(s, " period: %u ns", state.period);
- seq_printf(s, " duty: %u ns", state.duty_cycle);
+ seq_printf(s, " period: %llu ns", state.period);
+ seq_printf(s, " duty: %llu ns", state.duty_cycle);
seq_printf(s, " polarity: %s",
state.polarity ? "inverse" : "normal");
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 67fca62..134c146 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
if (!div) {
/* Clock is too slow to achieve requested period. */
- dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %u ns\n", state->period);
+ dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %llu ns\n", state->period);
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index 2389b86..449dbc0 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static ssize_t period_show(struct device *child,
pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.period);
+ return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.period);
}
static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child,
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child,
struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
struct pwm_state state;
- unsigned int val;
+ u64 val;
int ret;
- ret = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtou64(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_show(struct device *child,
pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.duty_cycle);
+ return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.duty_cycle);
}
static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child,
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 2635b2a..a13ff38 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ enum pwm_polarity {
* current PWM hardware state.
*/
struct pwm_args {
- unsigned int period;
+ u64 period;
enum pwm_polarity polarity;
};
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ enum {
* @enabled: PWM enabled status
*/
struct pwm_state {
- unsigned int period;
- unsigned int duty_cycle;
+ u64 period;
+ u64 duty_cycle;
enum pwm_polarity polarity;
bool enabled;
};
@@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
return state.enabled;
}
-static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period)
+static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, u64 period)
{
if (pwm)
pwm->state.period = period;
}
-static inline unsigned int pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
+static inline u64 pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
struct pwm_state state;
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty)
pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty;
}
-static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
+static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
struct pwm_state state;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists